Pure Beauty (Car Version)

I've heard conversation coming out of animal pens that is more intelligent than what is going on in here.
BradyS21
Posts: 1228
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:15 pm
Team: EuroTrashSilencer
Location: Working the corner to earn money to buy a new pipe because I don't know what my works pipe does :'(

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by BradyS21 »

supercross711 wrote:What a homo! Slow piece of shit.
tyskorn wrote:WHOA WHOA WHOA. I apologize for Brady's language, everyone.
Ih8Hondas
Posts: 1260
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:00 am
Team: One Man Goon Squad
Location: Tijeras, NM

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by Ih8Hondas »

The most hilariously badass skanky looking car ever. I want it so bad.

That guy on the two stroke
will96
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by will96 »

That car is among one of my favorites. Led by this:
Image
[color=#FF0000]jlv[/color] wrote:I'd probably ban him if I understood what he just said.
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

1st gen rx7's are sexy looking cars
Image
kevin131mx
Posts: 859
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:59 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by kevin131mx »

Finally got to lower my car more and man I love the way these wheels fit. If I got some drop plates I could go fender to lip
Image
kevin131mx
Posts: 859
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:59 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by kevin131mx »

oops double post
Image
rmitch524
Posts: 523
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 10:43 pm
Team: Jack Daniel's Racing
Location: Arizona

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by rmitch524 »

So what happens if you hit a bump?
2019 RF EU Iron Man Moto 1 Champion
Tlangs daddy 2020 RF EU SouthWick
dylan22
Posts: 2669
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 7:46 am
Location: South Australia

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by dylan22 »

Yeah, I've tried to understand these cars but it's got me fucked. What's the point of a car, if you can't drive over a leaf without guard rubbing the shit out of it. It'd be like well I wanna go down that road but there's a one inch drain across the road and my car will scrape.
Image
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

skavanger's mk3 by far my fav

Running 18x11 all around

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
squirrelboy86
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:16 pm
Team: SD | Action Suzuki

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by squirrelboy86 »

Yeah don't want to hate on anyone for their choice in cars because I know everyone likes different things. But I still don't understand the stanced cars or the stretched tires or having the car so low that you can't drive it unless it is all perfect flat roads. I know the ZR1 is not even close to as low as most of the cars you guys post and I have to go at a 45 degree angle to get out of the driveway and there are places I can't go to because I don't want to tear off the front splitter. I can't imagine how driving a car where you have to worry about tearing it up just cruising around could be enjoyable. Although I guess a lot of times it is just a looks thing and personally I am for performance and usability over looks.
Roy Mitchell wrote:I got cockblocked by the refrigerator
Click for go fast.
supercross711
Posts: 3032
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: North Carolina USA

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by supercross711 »

My miata is at -1 camber in the back -3 in the front and its fully for drift function, its not as low as a had it but even when it was slammed it wasn't that hard to get around, and i live on some of the worst roads in the country.
Image
P2sta wrote:Read it again, you are going full are going full 'meurican here.
supercross711
Posts: 3032
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: North Carolina USA

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by supercross711 »

kevin131mx wrote:Finally got to lower my car more and man I love the way these wheels fit. If I got some drop plates I could go fender to lip
Image
Id leave it like that dude, it looks so perfect, Being super low gets a bit annoying, your probably at a pretty damn good height right now .
Image
P2sta wrote:Read it again, you are going full are going full 'meurican here.
kevin131mx
Posts: 859
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:59 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by kevin131mx »

Yeah my car is pretty damn low right now and it's really not that hard to drive, and I live in northeast PA. As long as you don't drive like an idiot it's totally fine. Not to mention it handles 1000x better
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

more camber in the front is better for grip at full lock depending how your steering angle mods are.

Image

So that mk3 gets drifted so more camber in the front the better it is.

I Also Like the look of having hella camber in the front.
Now camber in the rear is pointless other then fitting the wheels.

Looks wise I like it, not every one likes it. and the lower you are the better it looks (IMO)

hell,
FD back in the day. Slammed as fuck with about a 450HP KA
Image

But some people prefer to sacrifice a lil bit of performance for a fuck load of style and to look cool. And I completely understand.

Now at a drag stand point you want as much contact patch as possible. so no camber.

Also if its a slower car streched tires and camber just makes like grip and easier to kick it out loose.
(dont you just wear threw tires?) not really if your alignment is good. and once tires get worn just get them flipped that cost like 10-20$ here.

So theres pro's and con's my personally I just love how it looks.
I also love hella camber in the front because it makes your steering more responsive since youll have less contact patch.
Image
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

less grip*
Image
Post Reply